{"id":447,"date":"2017-04-27T11:08:37","date_gmt":"2017-04-27T09:08:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/?p=447"},"modified":"2024-04-04T17:08:41","modified_gmt":"2024-04-04T15:08:41","slug":"what-did-the-german-trading-stations-in-iceland-look-like","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/?p=447","title":{"rendered":"What did the German trading stations in Iceland look like?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

The Danish trading station at Grundarfj\u00f6r\u00f0ur, as depicted in the 1790s. Before the Danes took over the trading post in the early 17th century it was in the hands of German merchants.<\/p><\/div>\n

In the 16th century there were approximately 25 trading stations in Iceland which were regularly frequented by merchants from Bremen, Hamburg, Oldenburg or L\u00fcbeck. Most of these stations lay in the western part of the island, around the Sn\u00e6fellsnes and Reykjanes peninsulas and in the Westfjords, because these were the areas where most fishing settlements were located and where cod, which was transformed into the main trading commodity stockfish, was abundant.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

German trading stations in Iceland. Landey is near Kumbaravogur (map by Libby Mulqueeny, Mark Gardiner and Natascha Mehler).<\/p><\/div>\n

It is difficult to tell what these German trading stations looked like because none have survived until today. In 1604, the Danish king Christian IV ordered to tear down all German buildings in Iceland, as a consequence of his imposition of the Danish trade monopoly (1602\u20131787). During the early 17th\u00a0century many of the German trading stations (such as Grundarfj\u00f6r\u00f0ur in the image above) were taken over by Danish traders and subsequently developed into permanent and more substantial settlements, many of which still exist today. What we don’t know is whether the Danish traders really tore down the German buildings, as was the will of the king, or simply re-used the buildings and infrastructure. The latter would certainly have been more practical in a country where building material was scarce.<\/p>\n

Luckily, a handful of German trading sites did not develop into modern settlements and remains have survived until today. One of them is situated on the small tidal island of Landey at the northern side of the Sn\u00e6fellsnes peninsula, near the present farm of Bjarnarh\u00f6fn<\/a>. Written sources mention a trading post visited by merchants from Oldenburg and Bremen in the 1590s, but the amount of information from the surviving documents is very low. In 1593, Carsten Bake from Bremen acquired a three-years license for the harbour, and afterwards the harbour was given to the count of Oldenburg. In 1599, a request by the count to renew the license for Landey was denied by the Danish king because it was already in use by someone else. Who this person was is not mentioned.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Ruins of German trading stations at Kaupsta\u00f0artangi and Landey (map by Mark Gardiner, Natascha Mehler and Libby Mulqueeny).<\/p><\/div>\n

Today, Landey is a small island only used by sheep for grazing. The outlines of two buildings are clearly visible. They are situated on a small plain near a beach that was used as a landing site, to pull up small boats. The western side of the island faces a bay called Kumbaravogur, and on the other side of that bay lies Kaupsta\u00f0artangi, a headland where the remains of a trading station called Kummerwage<\/em> have survived. This close proximity could be the reason why Landey started to be used as a trading post in the first place, as Kummerwage<\/em> had been a harbour of Bremen merchants for a long time, but was given to Joachim Kolling from Oldenburg in 1580. Bremen tried hard to get the harbour back, but without success. The merchants of Bremen must have tricked the Danish king in requesting a license for the nearby Landey. When the king realised his mistake he included the clause that the license would go to Oldenburg after the Bremen one expired.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

The ruins of two buildings at Landey (centre), on a green plain overlooking the landing site (image Natascha Mehler, 2016).<\/p><\/div>\n

A trial excavation conducted with Fornleifastofnun \u00cdslands<\/a> at Landey in the summer of 2016 has shown that both buildings on Landey were indeed dwellings, although rather simple constructions. The walls were built\u00a0in the Icelandic way, made of turf with stone linings. A fire place was discovered in the western building and no signs of furniture or other equipment were found. However, ten fragments of a ceramic cooking pot made of red earthenware were discovered. ICP-MS analysis<\/a> of the sherds (conducted by Torbj\u00f6rn Brorsson, KKS<\/a>) has shown that the pot was made in Bremen, or in very close vicinity thereof (e.g. in Oldenburg).<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

The trial trench through the western building at Landey. The outlines of the building are clearly visible, as is the turf construction of the wall (image Vilmundur P\u00e1lmason, 2016).<\/p><\/div>\n

The building to the east has two inner partition walls which indicates that it could have been used as a storage facility. Taking the scarce written and archaeological evidence together we can conclude that the buildings were indeed dwellings of some sort but only used for a very short time. This corresponds well with what we know about the Icelandic trading stations from other written sources: they were only used during the summers, when the foreign vessels were in Iceland, and their owners did not invest in solid infrastructure because they were not sure whether they would return the next summer. For Landey, records only exist for the 1590s.<\/p>\n

Written sources indicate that merchants generally slept in the dwellings on land while the ship\u00b4s crew stayed on board. However, the excavations at Landey give food for thought. A\u00a0Northern German merchant might have found it more comfortable to stay on board than to spend his nights in a damp and dark turf building…<\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/p>\n

D. Kohl, Der oldenburg-isl\u00e4ndische Handel im 16. Jahrhundert. Oldenburger Jahrbuch 13, 1905, 34\u201353.<\/p>\n

Mehler & M. Gardiner, On the Verge of Colonialism: English and Hanseatic Trade in the North Atlantic Islands, in Peter\u00a0Pope and Shannon Lewis-Simpson\u00a0(eds.), Exploring Atlantic Transitions: Archaeologies of Permanence and Transience in New Found Lands. Society of Post-Medieval Archaeology\u00a0Monograph 8\u00a0(Woodbrige 2013) 1-15.<\/p>\n

Oldenburg, Nieders\u00e4chsisches Landesarchiv, Best. 20, -25, no. 6.<\/p>\n

Copenhagen, Rigsarkivet, Tyske Kancelli D 11, Pakke 28 (Island og F\u00e6r\u00f8er, Supplement II, no. 25)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the 16th century there were approximately 25 trading stations in Iceland which were regularly frequented by merchants from Bremen, Hamburg, Oldenburg or L\u00fcbeck. Most of these stations lay in the western part of the island, around the Sn\u00e6fellsnes and Reykjanes peninsulas and in the Westfjords, because these were the areas where most fishing settlements […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,46],"tags":[73,33,65,119,117,28,115,116,77,118],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reports","category-stories","tag-archaeology","tag-bremen","tag-ceramic","tag-denmark","tag-excavation","tag-iceland","tag-kumbaravogur","tag-landey","tag-oldenburg","tag-trading-station"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":475,"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions\/475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fishandships.dsm.museum\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}